A Place Called Lishui Lishui HistoryLishui CultureLishui TownsLishui Nature
Lishui Towns Lishui · Nanjing

Surnames and Lineage · Article

Ancestral Halls and Surnames in the Traditional Villages

Clues from Cangkou, Shishanxia and Zhujia

Among the traditional villages of Lishui that can be identified by name, three are reported to retain ancestral halls: those of the Rui, Fan and Qiu families at Cangkou, of the Liu family at Shishanxia, and of the Zhu family at Zhujia. All the clues come from press reports, and this entry draws no conclusion on their dates or protection grades.

Three clues

Village Subdistrict or town Ancestral halls As reported
Cangkou Honglan Subdistrict, Tangxi Village Rui, Fan and Qiu family halls "a century old"
Shishanxia Jingqiao Town, Ruijia Village Liu family hall built in 1820, listed as a municipal protected relic in 2006
Zhujia Hefeng Town, Zhangjia Village Zhu family hall built some four hundred years ago, three bays by three, 638 sq m

All three follow one pattern: a settlement dominated by one or two surnames, with the ancestral hall of that surname surviving. Cangkou has three halls for three surnames, Rui, Fan and Qiu; Shishanxia and Zhujia have one each, for the Liu and the Zhu.

What the official lists record

The grade and period of the three halls can now be checked against official published documents, a layer of evidence added to this entry.

Among the five Lishui entries under the ancient buildings category in the third batch of municipal protected cultural relics published under Ning Zheng Fa [2006] No. 131, three are relevant here: Rui Ancestral Hall, Honglan (Qing dynasty, Honglan Town, Lishui County), Liu Ancestral Hall, Jingqiao (Ming dynasty, Jingqiao Town, Lishui County), and Zhu Ancestral Hall, Hefeng (Qing dynasty, Hefeng Town, Lishui County). All three are municipal-level protected cultural relics, published on 10 June 2006.

In the third batch of district-level protected sites published under Li Zheng Fa [2017] No. 197, the Fan and Qiu ancestral halls stand as items 5 and 6, both dated to the Qing dynasty, with their locations both given as Cangkou Village, Honglan Town. It follows that the Fan and Qiu halls of Cangkou are district-level protected cultural relics while the Rui hall is municipal-level: the grades of the three halls in one village are not the same, which could not be seen from the press reports. Note that the district list gives the address only to the level of Cangkou Village, while the traditional village list writes Cangkou as "Cangkou, Tangxi Village, Honglan Subdistrict"; both are village-level forms, and this library holds no conclusive document on how Cangkou is affiliated at administrative village level.

A further document shows the name still in use: in the public notice of 3 June 2026 of the fifth batch of district place-name cultural heritage, "Rui Ancestral Hall" appears under the Honglan Subdistrict row. That document is a draft seeking comment and settles neither dates nor form.

Dimensions and the level of their sources

Dimension figures exist for only one of the halls, that of the Rui at Cangkou, and the level of those sources must be marked. The Ancestral Hall Website entry on the Rui Ancestral Hall at Cangkou states that the hall has three ranges in front and back, three bays in width and a total area of 518 square metres, with the rear range named Zhenji Hall; the designer's own description of the renovation project at the Cangkou halls also gives the Rui Ancestral Hall as "three ranges in its courtyard, three bays in width", so the two support each other. That site is a private compilation of materials with low authority; this entry records it only as supporting evidence and does not use it to settle a date of construction.

The designer's description further records that the hall preserves the Comprehensive Genealogy of the Three Great Branches of the Rui Family of Pingyuan. A genealogy is an important physical clue to the history of an ancestral hall; this library holds neither a facsimile nor a catalogue entry for it, and no lineage is traced from it here.

A conflict of grade must be placed side by side: the Lishui District Media report of 2023 quotes the deputy party secretary of Tangxi Village, Shi Kun, as saying that the Fan and Qiu halls "are among the municipal-level protected cultural relics", whereas in the two official lists the only municipal-level ancestral hall in Lishui District is the Rui Ancestral Hall at Honglan, and the Fan and Qiu halls are entered in the third batch of district-level protected sites. Following the discipline of this library, the grade follows the official lists; the municipal-level claim of the report is placed alongside it and does not rewrite the grade.

A disagreement on form must also be placed side by side: the designer's description states that the Qiu and Fan halls are "of the same form, a single-range courtyard with a skywell", while the Lishui District Media report describes the Qiu ancestral hall as a two-range structure divided into a front hall and a rear hall with wide side rooms, forming a small "quadrangle" arrangement. The two are not merged and neither is preferred; the more likely explanation is a difference in what "one range" and "two ranges" count, as against the front and rear halls of the main building, but neither material defines its terms, so both simply stand side by side. That description of form concerns the Qiu hall alone; the report gives no separate form for the Fan hall, and it must not be transferred. This entry does not settle the disagreement; the present layout of each hall awaits determination by the cultural heritage authorities.

The same report records that the two halls "began renovation again last December", a relative expression; the page carries no definite date, and this library does not use it to fix the year the renovation began.

An academic source adds a further layer: Yin Haocheng's 2024 paper gives the great Rui ancestral hall the name Zhenji Hall, dating its first construction to the Kangxi reign of the Qing, recording its destruction in the eighth year of the Xianfeng reign and its rebuilding in the twelfth year of the Tongzhi reign, completed the following year; it also records that the Rui had two further branch halls, Houde Hall and Sanshan Hall, now destroyed, of which only Zhenji Hall survives. For the Fan and Qiu halls the paper gives only existence and surname information, with no history, hall name or dimensions, and its data must not be transferred to those two.

Basis and limits

Both reporting sources are second-hand press reports: the Yangtse Evening Post report carries no publication date, and The Paper report is a local news item of 8 April 2020. Therefore:

  • "A century old" and "some four hundred years ago" are the reports' own wording, approximations that this entry does not use as datings.
  • The 1820 construction and the 2006 listing of the Liu family hall at Shishanxia are more specific but still come from press reports; the 2006 is confirmed by the published document Ning Zheng Fa [2006] No. 131, while the period of that document reads Ming dynasty, standing side by side with the 1820 of the report.
  • The figures given in the reports for the Zhu family hall at Zhujia, three bays by three and 638 square metres, rest on that single source, and the municipal published document contains no description of form, so they cannot be checked.
  • Whether the villages hold ancestral halls not mentioned in the reports is not recorded in the sources used here. The Cangkou conservation plan press release names the village's principal historic buildings as the Rui, Qiu and Fan ancestral halls and the old Chen residence, which is the most concentrated official statement on the halls at Cangkou held here, and can be checked against the reports.

Division of work

The form, dimensions, protection grade and publication batch of these halls belong to the history site of this group. This entry offers only a cross-village summary; it neither repeats what the individual village entries already say nor stands in for the history site's treatment of the buildings. The list verification newly added here settles only grade and batch; the dimension figures still await determination by the cultural heritage authorities.

Points of doubt

  • None of the three halls has a first-hand basis such as an inscription or genealogy for its date of construction; for the Liu hall at Shishanxia the reported year 1820 and the period "Ming dynasty" of the municipal published document stand side by side, and a fuller account awaits sources.
  • When the three surnames at Cangkou, the Liu at Shishanxia and the Zhu at Zhujia moved into these villages, and from where, is not recorded in the sources used here.
  • The grades of the three halls in Cangkou Village differ, Rui municipal and Fan and Qiu district-level, as follows from the two published documents; the Lishui District Media report however calls the Fan and Qiu halls municipal-level, so the two accounts of grade stand side by side and the official lists are followed.
  • Neither published document records the publication batch or the protection extent of any hall; the year the two halls began renovation is given in the report only as a relative expression without a date.
  • The dimensions of the Rui Ancestral Hall, three ranges, three bays and 518 square metres, rest at present on two supporting sources, a private compilation and a designer's own description, which may share a single origin; this library draws no conclusion from them.
  • The affiliation of Cangkou at administrative village level appears in two forms in the sources, "Cangkou, Tangxi Village, Honglan Subdistrict" in the traditional village list and "Cangkou Village, Honglan Town" in the district protected list; this library holds no document on the adjustment of administrative villages to settle it.

The text of this entry is licensed CC BY 4.0; please credit the source when reusing it. This entry has not yet been checked against its sources by a second person.